Tuesday, January 10, 2023

How about THAT ONE, folks!!??!!

 The 2022 SeegerOlympics have concluded, winding up on the final day of competition on Friday, December 30.  It was a down-to-the-wire photo finish (albeit with a quite rosy filter for Davin!) with a final score of 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 with Davin Seeger winning on the first tiebreaker (which was decided at the start of March 2022, and so hung over the rest of the competition) by being the only competitor to select the correct winners of Amazing Race 33.


And so, here is how the rest of the Olympic Year went down:

1. Champions League Pick-'Em (Joel) - This was the first event to have it's parameters established, with the draft order established on January 3rd.  Reese selected Real Madrid with the 6th pick to win it over all of the favorites (and others, including Tim's surprise Villareal selected at 13 who beat 1st overall pick, and betting favorite, Bayern Munich on their way to the semifinals!)

Reese 1 - 0 All Others

2. Bowling (Brooke) - Although the spirit of the competition was to have everyone select at some point throughout the year one game of bowling that they played as "the official event", in the end we all needed to head down to Cougar Lanes together on Wednesday, December 28th to play it out.  Unsurprisingly, Tim won the event with 15 - 20 pins to spare or so, but more intriguingly, this wasn't Tim's highest bowling score of the year.

Reese & Tim 1 - 0 All Others

3. Smash-Up Tournament (Andy!) - A bold choice for Andy (I was surprised to see going back in the text chain that it was indeed his event and format) where the top two finishers in each 4-player semi-final move on to the final. He failed to move on in a tough semi-final against Davin, Claire, & Brooke, and Joel, after narrowly winning his opening round against Reese and Tim, won a tough final with randomly selected decks against the three experts in the event...

Reese, Tim & Joel 1 - 0 All Others

4. Statue Football (Davin) - The final event played, on 30 December 2022, found Davin and Joel tied 2-2 in wins (spoiler alert!!) with Davin holding the tiebreaker, so all he needed was anyone except Joel to win the event.  After Joel & Davin hooked up for the first touchdown, a glitch in the rules (which Joel kind of invents on the fly when there are no clear precedents) caused Andy to be starting in or near the end zone after each score, so after a first dropped pass each possession, Andy quicky racked up the necessary 28 points for the victory.

Reese, Tim, Joel & Andy 1 - 0 All Others

5. Black-Jack w/ Papa as Dealer (Tim) - Tim, then Joel were the first two to compete in this event, which kept scores a secret to all but those who had played until Reese played the final round on December 27th.  Tim & Joel both crapped out on their attempts at $0.00, and so did each and every subsequent Seeger to take part until Brooke had a series of wins and got to $1.75 and subsequently stopped betting (like a reasonable gambler).  Jen then played her round, and topped Brooke's tally to take the point! (I think at around $2.25, but exact total has been lost...).  When Reese stepped up (to sit down) in front of Papa, she initially won several rounds, and looked to be set to take the point (not knowing the score she needed to hit).  After surpassing Jen's score, she fell back a bit, and on the last bet (as time ran out), she went all in... and lost.

All Others 1 - 0 Davin, Claire, Brooke

6. Random Video Game Tournament (Joel) - The first point (I think) scored last year was Davin's victory in this tournament, which had a lot more games played at the Omaha Seeger house, than I had expected (6 out of 7).  The outlier was a massive upset in the first round with Tim defeating Joel on the Sega Master System in Hang On!  Davin eventually won the whole tournament, defeating Reese who had won the first round against Brooke in some weird kitchen cooking game...

All Others 1 - [0 Claire, Brooke]

7. Wikipedia Tournament (Davin) - Evidently, Davin had learned about this game on some youTube channel and chose the event as a clicking through the fastest (rather than the fewest clicks) from one random Wikipedia page to another. Joel secretly is a Wikipedia nerd, and worked his way to the final against Reese who was also dominant in the earlier rounds, but Joel won making his way to a congressional election in the Philippines in the 1960s.

Joel 2 - 1 Most Others [0 Claire & Brooke]

8. Two-Player Strategy Board Game Tournament (Andy) - 8 strategy games were initially laid out on the pool table, and were randomly selected for each match.  Davin won a shock (to Andy, anyway) first round win (over Andy - in case that wasn't clear) in Quits, and Reese defeated Joel to get to the finals against Davin, who won Outwit to win the final and the point

Joel & Davin 2 - 1 Most Others [0 Claire & Brooke]

And so, with the tiebreaker won early in the year, Davin is the 2022 Champion - the first year-long competition between 8 Seegers, and Davin becomes (I don't know for sure, not being able to check the actual trophy) only the second (?) person to win back to back SeegerOlympics.

Congratulations, and better luck next year to everyone!

Friday, January 28, 2022

Event #6: Random Video Game Tournament

Welcome to the Random Video Game Tournament for the 2022 SeegerOlympics!

The Bracket is shown here (selection process is shown here), and rules are as follows:

1. Single Elimination tournament, where competitors play a single game [see sub-rule 1a] of a randomly selected video game [see sub-rule 1b] located within the next home or domicile that the two competitors next enter together [see sub-rule 1c].

     1a. Depending on the game selected, competitors will agree upon the most appropriate mode for competition in that particular video game.  So, if the game includes a "Story Mode" and a "Battle Mode", it is likely that the battle mode will be preferable, because it allows for direct competition.  If a game contains several games in one (e.g. Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games) the competitors will come to an agreement within the confines of the video game of what will determine the framework of the competition and what will signify victory (with any other SeegerOlympic competitors in the same house at the time of selection serving as tiebreakers / arbiters).  The game can include multiple events (e.g. if Olympics or mini-game style video game) to determine the winner or one randomly selected event, as decided by the two who will be playing the game.  If a game has 2 or more separate modes for direct competition (e.g. Mario Kart has both Vs. Racing Mode & Battle Mode) a random roll will determine which one is selected whenever possible.

     1b. Random selection will be determined by a dice roll or use of the random number generator found at https://www.random.org/ and will be selected thusly: 
          First, the game system is selected by the competitors determining the number of video game systems contained within the household they are in and rolling to see which one the game will be played upon.  [NOTE: iPhones / iPads / phones / tablets may be counted as a game system if the pairing decide they will, but in that case all of the phones/tablets in that household will count as a single game system, and if that system is selected, randomness will also decide which particular phone will have a random game selected on it.] Video game systems that are in a house that are not hooked up currently may be counted in the random selection, but don't need to be (e.g. if we're not sure that the ColecoVision @ the Clinton House works, we can try to hook it up to decide if it works, but don't absolutely need to).  Any video game system that is currently hooked up in a household must be part of the selection process.
          Second, a game will be randomly selected for the chosen system once the competitors determine all of the games that are in the house for that system.  No additional games may be downloaded onto a system once the selection process has started, however, any games that are currently on the system must be included in the selection process.

     1c. Each match-up will be played in the house that the two players matched up next enter together.  This means that in a case like the only intra-household match-up for this first round (Jen v. Davin), they would both at some time need to both leave and re-enter the Seeger House on Madison Street before the locale is determined.  If for some reason they both left the house today or tomorrow, and then both went in to the next door neighbors house before they both came back home, the game would need to be played (and selected) at that alternative location.

2. Practice / Warm-Up games are permitted, so if you're unfamiliar with a game, you are allowed to play it a few times to get up to speed before the official competition, provided that the match-up be played before either party departs the home in which it is going to be played for more than 48 hours (so if Omaha Seegers are in Clinton for Spring Break, and Joel & Tim are matching up, we could each practice as much as we want as long as we get the game in before you guys depart back for Omaha).

Wednesday, January 05, 2022

2022 is Underway! (obviously...)

 Thanks to Tim, the SeegerOlympics 2022 are happening!!!

After Davin's SeegerOlympic victory in June 2021, the Dick Koch Trophy has been updated, and we have a slate of 2022 events selected, which may span the better part of 2022.  8 Events, and 2 Tie-Breakers to be played during calendar year 2022.  The Events are as follows:

  1. Champions League Pick-Em
  2. Bowling
  3. Smash-Up Tournament
  4. Statue Football
  5. Black-Jack w/ Papa (as Dealer)
  6. Random Video Game Tournament
  7. Wikipedia Tournament (?)
  8. Two-Player Strategy Board Game Tournament
Tie Breakers

  1. Amazing Race Pick-Em
  2. Scratch-Off Lottery Tickets ($5)


Saturday, June 16, 2018

Weight for it...

The Dick Koch Trophy (awarded sorta-annually for the Seeger Olympics competition) is not unlike the House Cup of Hogwarts. 

Points can often come from anywhere - unexpectedly.  The guiding principle (there are few rules and no laws in the Seeger Olympics, methinks) is fair play.

The World Cup picks are in, with the champs being selected:

Andy took England, Brooke - Uruguay, Joel - Belgium, Claire - Switzerland, Davin - Portugal, Kylie - Brazil, Tim - Mexico, Jen - Iceland!

Jen's inspired pick led to a Lovable Loser's event, where each contestant picks a team with less than 1% chance to win the World Cup (according to FiveThirtyEight, the site that makes the improbable unlikely).  No one has yet selected their underdog yet, although they are up for grabs (excepting Iceland, who only Jen can pick until noon on Sunday, because of her bold selection in the first event).

This leads me to two questions for consideration... Unbalanced Justice & Weighting for Events:

The Scales of Justice are an interesting metaphor.  We think of it symbolizing that all are equal in the eyes of the law (although justice is also meant to be blind).  What's interesting about the old-timey scales that we generally associate with justice is that they have built-in weights.  One can 'tip the scale' as it were.  Just like Jen has additional time to choose Iceland because of her boldness, so too advantage should be given to the worthier case.

With a myriad of competitors in this year's SeegerOlympics, I am also curious about exploring the idea of weighted events.  If all 8 of us play Trivial Pursuit with 2 teams of 4, should 4 points be awarded (1 to each winning team member)?  If so, what about an event like the WC picks.  Assuming nobody has picked the winner (Germany, after all remains unselected), there will almost certainly be a tie.  Should all of those tied for the lead get a point or divide one point into fractions (i love the idea of fractional points).  Weighted events where we all compete (say worth 8 total points, or 4, or maybe 10) would allow for sub-group events (Joel & Brooke & Kylie & Andy & Tim) could be for just one point, and that would allow for many sub-group events, but still the big points at stake for the all-competitor events.

Not sure how it would work, but i'm sure we could figure it.

Sunday, May 27, 2018

Look for an all-new, exciting-as-ever, reinvigorated Seeger Olympics, 2018 edition.

We will see exactly which Seegers want to be involved for this seven-month event, beginning in June and running until December 31, 2018. We do know that some (all) of the next generation -- Kylie, Davin, Claire -- are interested in being a part of it.

Details to follow...

Saturday, June 25, 2016

Back at it?

Tim declared a 4-person event betwixt Andy, Tim, Kylie & Joel. A coaster toss, innocent enough, but enough, perhaps to re-start the whole thing again. 

Tim won his coaster game and then Joel called a derivation of Tumblin' Dice between the same four competitors. Andy won that event, and he and Tim took an early lead in the 2016 competition. 

Rules will be that any 3 Seeger Competitors from at least two different towns can compete in official events. There will need to be an appeals process at year end if some competitors aren't able to compete in enough events to be able to win the overall competition. 

Sunday, August 16, 2009

just as a reminder

I know there has been some (a lot) some (very little) interest in how to submit a Seeger Olympic Event (and then actually have said event selected for a competition). So, this post will serve as a final decisiory ruling.

The best way to get an event selected is to submit it to the blog, via a comment. In the comment, make sure you make it clear how many/who the event is for (that is, is it a 5 person event, or just a Tim v. Brooke). Also, plan for tiebreakers if a tie is at all likely, and be specific as to how the event will be scored.

The basic rule is that at least half of the participants must agree to a suggested event, but to date, no event submitted to the seegerOlympics blog has been turned down. So, get involved.

(note: if your event will cost significant amounts of money {say you want to set up a scavenger hunt across Europe}, feel free to donate to the SeegerOlympics fund... just leave change on the sidewalk... i'm sure we'll come across it.)